Table of Contents
Definition / general | Essential features | Terminology | Antigens | Antibodies | Pathophysiology | Clinical features | Transmission | Laboratory | Case reports | Additional references | Board review style question #1 | Board review style answer #1 | Board review style question #2 | Board review style answer #2Cite this page: Adkins BD, Booth GS. MNS system. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/transfusionmedMNSUsystem.html. Accessed April 1st, 2025.
Definition / general
- MNSU blood group system is antigenic on the surface of red blood cells (RBC)
- Antibodies to M and N are generally clinically insignificant
- Antibodies to other antigens, such as S, s and U, are clinically significant
Essential features
- Antibodies to M and N are generally clinically insignificant
- Antibodies to other antigens, such as S, s and U, are clinically significant
- There are numerous high frequency and low frequency antigens, some of which are clinically significant
Terminology
- M (MNS1), N (MNS2), S (MNS3), s (MNS4)
- U (MNS5) or universal
- Glycophorin A (GPA, CD235A)
- Glycophorin B (GPB, CD235B)
Antigens
- Type: peptide
- M and N are present on glycophorin A protein, while S, s and U are present on glycophorin B protein
- Glycophorins A and B are encoded by 2 homologous genes, GYPA and GYPB, respectively, both of which are located on chromosome 4
- ~50 antigens in total (Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017)
- Glycophorin molecules contribute to RBC membrane structure with an association to band 3 and likewise act as ligands for Plasmodium falciparum (Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017)
- U is a high frequency antigen found on glycophorin B (Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017)
- Mur antigen is present in ~10% of Chinese and Thai individuals (Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017)
- Mia is a low prevalence antigen in the general population (0.01% occurrence) but can be found in certain Asian populations at rates of up to 15% (Reid: The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook, 3rd Edition, 2012)
Race / ethnicity | M+N- | M+N+ | M-N+ | M-N- | S+s- | S+s+ | S-s+ | S-s- |
White | 30% | 49% | 21% | Rare | 10% | 42% | 48% | Rare |
Black (U.S.) | 25% | 49% | 26% | Rare | 6% | 24% | 68% | 2% |
Antibodies
- Antibodies to M and N are usually cold reactive, not clinically significant and naturally occurring, while S, s and U antibodies are clinically significant
- M antibodies tend to be IgM and are generally not associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) (rarely reported), though assessment for IgG conversion should be considered (AJP Rep 2017;7:e205)
- N antibodies are generally IgM
- S, s, U and other antibodies tend to be IgG and can cause hemolytic transfusion reactions and HDFN (Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017)
- N antigen exists on the N terminus of the glycophorin A peptide, similar to the N terminus of all glycophorin B peptides; hence, antibodies against N are less common (Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017)
- Mur antibodies are common in Southeast Asia (Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017)
- Mia antibodies are clinically significant but reactions are uncommon due to low population prevalence amongst American donors; this may vary based on donor population incidence (Reid: The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook, 3rd Edition, 2012)
Pathophysiology
- Antibodies to M can form naturally without exposure, with auto anti-M commonly encountered
- S, s and U antibodies are clinically significant
- Exposure to antigens can lead to sensitization
- Reference: Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017
Clinical features
- African Americans have a deletion in the coding region of GYPB and can form antibodies against S, s and U (a high prevalence antigen)
- High prevalence of U antigen and scarcity of U negative donors render management of patients with anti-U challenging
- Presence of an N antibody suggests a lack of glycophorin B and may indicate patients can form anti-U antibodies
- Reference: Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017
Transmission
- Exposure to MNS antigens secondary to pregnancy or transfusion
Laboratory
- M, N, S and s are generally destroyed by enzyme treatment (Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017)
- M and N are trypsin sensitive but only slightly sensitive to alpha chemotrypsin (Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017)
- S and s are trypsin resistant but are sensitive to alpha chemotrypsin (Fung: Technical Manual, 19th Edition, 2017)
- IgM antibodies can be destroyed using dithiothreitol (DTT), which is useful for determining if there is an IgG component in pregnant patients
Case reports
- Fetal GP*Mur causing HDFN (Transfusion 2020;60:870)
- 1 year old girl, a hematology / oncology patient, presenting with anti-M antibody (J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ED20)
- 24 year old woman with pregnancy complicated by anti-S antibody and malaria infection (Transfus Apher Sci 2014;50:281)
- 28 year old woman with an Mk antibody with recurrent pregnancy loss (Transfusion 2017;57:376)
- 71 year old woman with anti-N antibody presenting as ABO discrepancy (Asian J Transfus Sci 2019;13:140)
Additional references
Board review style question #1
A gravida 1 para 0 mother is found to have an anti-M antibody. The clinical team wants to determine if the antibody is IgG or IgM. Treatment of the patient serum with which reagent destroys IgM antibodies and helps to determine if this is an IgG antibody?
- Addition of antihuman globulin
- Dithiothreitol (DTT)
- Enzyme treatment
- Polyethylene glycol (PEG) enhancement
Board review style answer #1
B. Dithiothreitol (DTT). Dithiothreitol is a reducing agent that destroys the disulfide bonds in IgM antibodies, allowing for identification of underlying antibodies. Answer A is incorrect because while the addition of antihuman globulin and reactivity at 37 °C (indirect antiglobulin test [IAT] / 37 °C phase) may help identify IgG reactivity, this does not destroy the IgM antibodies. Answers C and D are incorrect because enzyme treatment and PEG enhancement likewise do not destroy IgM and may have a variable effect on immunoreactivity.
Comment Here
Reference: MNSU system
Comment Here
Reference: MNSU system
Board review style question #2
A Jehovah's Witness (JW) patient agrees to receive plasma products only. A type and screen is found to be positive. The patient is disturbed when he sees this result in the patient portal, as he has no transfusion history. What is the best explanation to provide to the patient?
- He has likely been transfused with red blood cells (RBC) at some point and this is evidence
- These antibodies can be naturally occurring
- This is likely passive transfer from his recent fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion
- This patient needs a RBC transfusion
Board review style answer #2
B. These antibodies can be naturally occurring. Anti-M antibodies often occur naturally, are often IgM and are generally considered clinically insignificant. Answer A is incorrect because outside of an emergent setting, where consent cannot be obtained, patients must consent prior to all blood transfusions. Answer C is incorrect because it is important to note that some JW patients may accept certain blood components, so although it is possible that this patient received FFP, blood donors undergo antibody screening and positive donor units may or may not be transfused. Units may be labeled or discarded if antibodies are identified. Answer D is incorrect becuase nothing suggests that the patient requires a transfusion at this time.
Comment Here
Reference: MNSU system
Comment Here
Reference: MNSU system