Salivary glands

Primary salivary gland neoplasms

Malignant

Microsecretory adenocarcinoma


Editorial Board Member: Marc Pusztaszeri, M.D.
Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Kelly Magliocca, D.D.S., M.P.H.
Michael Mikula, M.D.
Lisa Rooper, M.D.

Last author update: 14 September 2023
Last staff update: 14 September 2023

Copyright: 2021-2025, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.

PubMed Search: Microsecretory adenocarcinoma

Michael Mikula, M.D.
Lisa Rooper, M.D.
Cite this page: Mikula M, Rooper L. Microsecretory adenocarcinoma. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/salivaryglandsmicrosecretoryadeno.html. Accessed January 16th, 2025.
Definition / general
Essential features
Terminology
  • Most cases previously grouped within the heterogeneous adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified category
ICD coding
  • ICD-10: C06.9 - malignant neoplasm of mouth, unspecified
Epidemiology
Sites
Pathophysiology
  • Recurrent SS18::MEF2C fusions
Etiology
  • No known risk factors
Clinical features
Diagnosis
  • Imaging modalities for workup of salivary gland neoplasms include ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021;164:27)
  • Histologic diagnosis of minor salivary gland tumors generally utilizes incisional or excisional biopsy
Prognostic factors
Case reports
Treatment
Gross description
Microscopic (histologic) description
Microscopic (histologic) images

Contributed by Michael Mikula, M.D.
Unencapsulated and well circumscribed

Unencapsulated and well circumscribed

Subtle invasive growth Subtle invasive growth

Subtle invasive growth

Microcysts

Microcysts

Basophilic secretions

Basophilic secretions


Fibromyxoid stroma

Fibromyxoid stroma

Monotonous hyperchromatic nuclei

Monotonous hyperchromatic nuclei

S100

S100

p63

p63

Electron microscopy description
  • Unknown at this time
Molecular / cytogenetics description
Molecular / cytogenetics images

Images hosted on other servers:
SS18 rearrangement by FISH

SS18 rearrangement by FISH

Sample pathology report
  • Right buccal mucosa, excision:
    • Microsecretory adenocarcinoma, low grade (1.5 cm) (see comment)
    • No lymphovascular or perineural invasion is present
    • Margins are uninvolved
    • Comment: The tumor consists of a well demarcated but focally infiltrative neoplasm consisting of anastomosing microcysts and cords of epithelioid cells with attenuated eosinophilic cytoplasm, prominent basophilic luminal secretions and scant hyalinized stroma. Immunostains show that the tumor cells are diffusely positive for S100 and p63 but negative for p40. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using SS18 break apart probe demonstrates an SS18 rearrangement. The combined morphological and immunohistochemical features support the diagnosis of microsecretory adenocarcinoma, a recently described low grade salivary gland neoplasm that generally has an excellent prognosis.
Differential diagnosis
Board review style question #1

A 42 year old woman presents for a routine dental cleaning and a small, firm, painless mass involving the hard palate is discovered. At higher power, the tumor cells are monotonous with hyperchromatic nuclei. They show diffuse positivity for S100 and p63 and are negative for p40. Break apart fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals a rearrangement of SS18. What is the diagnosis?

  1. Microsecretory adenocarcinoma
  2. Polymorphous adenocarcinoma
  3. Sclerosing microcystic adenocarcinoma
  4. Secretory carcinoma
  5. Tubular adenoid cystic carcinoma
Board review style answer #1
A. Microsecretory adenocarcinoma. The image shows a well demarcated mass composed of anastomosing microcysts containing prominent basophilic secretions. Answer B is incorrect because polymorphous adenocarcinoma can show tubular and microcribriform architecture with S100 positivity and discordant p63 and p40 staining; however, polymorphous adenocarcinoma typically shows more infiltrative borders and heterogeneous architecture. Answer C is incorrect because sclerosing microcystic adenocarcinoma can show microcystic architecture but demonstrates an infiltrative growth pattern and biphasic cell populations with a relatively abundant desmoplastic stromal component. Answer D is incorrect because secretory carcinoma demonstrates a microcystic architecture and is positive for S100 but tends to show predominantly eosinophilic secretions and is generally negative for p63. Answer E is incorrrect because tubular adenoid cystic carcinoma often shows some microcystic architecture with basophilic intraluminal secretions but shows widely infiltrative borders and at least focal cribriform architecture. Evidence of SS18 rearrangement is highly specific for microsecretory adenocarcinoma, which has been shown to harbor a unique MEF2C::SS18 fusion.

Comment Here

Reference: Microsecretory adenocarcinoma
Back to top
Image 01 Image 02