Table of Contents
Definition / general | Essential features | ICD coding | Epidemiology | Sites | Pathophysiology | Etiology | Clinical features | Diagnosis | Laboratory | Radiology description | Prognostic factors | Case reports | Treatment | Gross description | Microscopic (histologic) description | Microscopic (histologic) images | Positive stains | Negative stains | Molecular / cytogenetics description | Sample pathology report | Differential diagnosis | Board review style question #1 | Board review style answer #1 | Board review style question #2 | Board review style answer #2Cite this page: Gama AP, Choy B. Treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/prostatetreatmentrelatedneuroendocrine.html. Accessed December 2nd, 2024.
Definition / general
- Prostatic carcinomas that show complete or partial neuroendocrine differentiation following intensive suppression of androgen receptors by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
Essential features
- Documented history of antiandrogen therapy is required for the diagnosis of treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma (tNEPC)
- There are 3 histologic presentations: small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and tNEPC (SCNEC or LCNEC) combined with acinar adenocarcinoma
- Neuroendocrine differentiation is the result of a transdifferentiation of a castration resistant prostate cancer following ADT
- Gleason score is not reportable for areas with neuroendocrine components
- Prognosis of tNEPC is dismal, with a median survival following neuroendocrine transdifferentiation of < 1 year
ICD coding
- ICD-O: 8574/3 - adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation
- ICD-11: 2C82.Y & XH0U20 - other specified malignant neoplasms of prostate & neuroendocrine carcinoma, NOS
Epidemiology
- tNEPC comprises 10 - 15% of castration resistant prostate adenocarcinomas (Anticancer Res 2015;35:4145)
- Overall, primary SCNEC of the prostate represents 1 - 5% of prostate cancer (Ann Diagn Pathol 2019;42:48)
- However, focal neuroendocrine differentiation is common in adenocarcinomas with a high Gleason score
Sites
- Prostate
- Metastatic sites
Pathophysiology
- Phenotypic transition from an androgen responsive to an androgen indifferent state is associated with losses of TP53, RB1 and PTEN (Science 2018;362:91)
- Epigenetic factors including chromatin modification and DNA methylation also play a role in the development of tNEPC (Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022;13:926585)
Etiology
- Transdifferentiation of a castration resistant prostate cancer following ADT (Int J Urol 2018;25:345)
Clinical features
- Locally, the vast majority present with the same obstructive symptoms seen in conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma; however, tNEPC commonly presents with lymph node and visceral metastasis (Eur J Cancer 2019;121:7)
- Bone metastases are typically lytic (as opposed to classic osteoblastic bone metastasis on conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma) (Eur J Cancer 2019;121:7)
Diagnosis
- Histologic examination of tissue demonstrating partial or complete neuroendocrine differentiation (small cell or large cell components)
- Documented prior history of ADT
Laboratory
- Prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels tend to be lower than in conventional adenocarcinoma, reflecting transdifferentiation (Eur J Cancer 2019;121:7)
- Occasionally, serum levels of chromogranin A may be identified (Pathologe 2018;39:333)
Radiology description
- Metastatic foci can be detected by radiology and imaging
Prognostic factors
- tNEPC develops within 2 years of ADT (J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3383)
- Median survival following neuroendocrine transdifferentiation is < 1 year (J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3383)
- Tumors with pure SCNEC or LCNEC morphology have worse overall survival than those admixed with a conventional adenocarcinoma component (Eur J Cancer 2019;121:7, Urol Int 2019;103:383)
Case reports
- 49 year old man with BRCA2 mutated tNEPC and brain metastasis (Medicine (Baltimore) 2024;103:e37371)
- 51 year old man with tNEPC and resulting Cushing syndrome (Int J Urol 2016;23:1038)
- 75 year old man with BRCA2 mutated tNEPC treated with olaparib (IJU Case Rep 2023;7:115)
Treatment
- Pure SCNEC: adjuvant therapy with platinum based chemotherapy plus etoposide (Adv Anat Pathol 2024;31:70)
- Mixed acinar adenocarcinoma and SCNEC: platinum and taxane (Adv Anat Pathol 2024;31:70)
- Lutetium 177 prostate specific membrane antigen (177Lu PSMA) 617 radioligand therapy is under approval for treatment of metastatic disease (Front Chem 2023;11:1218670)
Gross description
- Extensive infiltration into surrounding structures
- Grossly identifiable necrosis may be seen
Microscopic (histologic) description
- SCNEC (Adv Anat Pathol 2024;31:70)
- Diffuse, sheet-like growth pattern
- Salt and pepper chromatin without prominent nucleoli
- Nuclear molding and crushing artifact
- Frequent tumor necrosis and brisk mitotic activity
- LCNEC (Adv Anat Pathol 2024;31:70)
- Organoid nests and sheets of cells with peripheral palisading
- Large nuclei with coarse to vesicular chromatin and occasional visible nucleoli
- Frequent tumor necrosis and brisk mitotic activity
- tNEPC (SCNEC or LCNEC) combined with acinar adenocarcinoma (Adv Anat Pathol 2024;31:70)
- Glandular component is usually high grade: Gleason score 8 or higher
- Do not consider neuroendocrine component in Gleason score
Microscopic (histologic) images
Contributed by Alcino Pires Gama, M.D. and Bonnie Choy, M.D.
Positive stains
- Up to 90% of cases are positive for at least 1 neuroendocrine marker (Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:705)
- TTF1 (positive in 50% of cases of SCNEC)
- Ki67: up to 90% in SCNEC and up to 50% in LCNEC
- p53: nuclear staining in most SCNEC
- Pankeratin: may be positive in a dot-like cytoplasmic pattern
Negative stains
- AR: may be positive in subset of SCNEC
- PSA and PAP (negative in up to 80% of tNEPC) (Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:705)
- RB1 loss (lost in up to 56% of tNEPC; however, not specific to tNEPC as it is present in 35% of all advanced prostate cancers) (Clin Cancer Res 2019;25:687)
Molecular / cytogenetics description
- Progression to androgen independent state may be driven by loss of TP53, RB1 and PTEN function
- Amplification of MYCN and AURKA (Adv Anat Pathol 2024;31:70)
Sample pathology report
- Prostate, radical prostatectomy:
- Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (see comment)
- No residual acinar carcinoma is noted
- Tumor is bilateral, presents as a 1.9 cm dominant nodule on the left
- Tumor involves 12% of prostatic tissue examined
- Extensive extraprostatic extension identified on both sides
- Both seminal vesicles are negative for carcinoma
- Tumor extends to involve the right posterior margin
- All the other surgical margins are negative for carcinoma
- Comment: The sections show a diffusely infiltrative small blue cell tumor with abundant crush artifact and tumor necrosis. The viable cells are disposed in sheets and present with nuclear molding, salt and pepper chromatin and have brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemistry was performed to show the tumor cells are positive for synaptophysin, chromogranin, INSM1 and TTF1 (patchy) and negative for NKX3, AE1 / AE3 and CD45. Ki67 proliferation index is > 90%. The background prostate is diffusely atrophic. No residual prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma is found. A remote history of prostate adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 8 (4+4), grade group 4, on long term androgen deprivation therapy is noted. Taken together, the findings are consistent with treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma.
- Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (see comment)
Differential diagnosis
- Neuroendocrine carcinomas not related to antiandrogen therapy:
- Tumors presenting with identical morphology as tNEPC but no documented history of antiandrogen therapy
- Metastatic SCNEC of other sites:
- Challenging differential diagnosis given that morphology and immunoprofile (including TTF1 expression) is essentially the same
- History of prostate cancer with ADT and evidence of residual / recurrent local disease in the prostate / pelvic floor / pelvic lymph nodes might be helpful in the differential diagnosis
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated (Gleason 5):
- May show focal neuroendocrine differentiation and loss of glandular architecture
- Combination of positive acinar markers (PSA, NKX3.1 and PSMA) and weak / focal or negative neuroendocrine markers, whereas tNEPC has predominantly neuroendocrine markers with focal / negative acinar markers
- Diffuse membranous pankeratin expression is suggestive of adenocarcinoma (whereas in tNEPC, it is cytoplasmic dot-like)
- Poorly differentiated urothelial carcinoma:
- Crush artifact in urothelial carcinoma can mimic tNEPC, especially SCNEC
- Negative for neuroendocrine markers and diffusely positive for high molecular weight keratin and p63
Board review style question #1
A 56 year old man with a medical history of prostatic adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 8 [4+4], grade group 4) treated with antiandrogen receptors presents with recurrence of urinary symptoms. A prostate transurethral resection is performed (see H&E and synaptophysin images above). Which of the following statements is true?
- Prostatic small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas are typically negative for TTF1
- Treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma is usually positive for androgen receptors
- Treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma with pure neuroendocrine component carries a worse prognosis than ones with conventional acinar adenocarcinoma component
- Tumor should be graded as Gleason score 10 (5+5), grade group 5
Board review style answer #1
C. Treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma (tNEPC) with pure neuroendocrine component carries a worse prognosis than ones with a conventional acinar adenocarcinoma component. Tumors with pure small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) or large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) morphology have a worse overall survival than those presenting with a conventional adenocarcinoma component. Answer D is incorrect because the neuroendocrine component should not be given a Gleason score. Answer A is incorrect because TTF1 is positive in up to 50% of prostatic SCNECs. Answer B is incorrect because tNEPCs are typically negative for androgen receptors.
Comment Here
Reference: Treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma
Comment Here
Reference: Treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma
Board review style question #2
A 74 year old man with a medical history of prostatic adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 7 [4+3], grade group 3) treated with antiandrogen receptors develops osteolytic bone metastasis and a liver lesion measuring 4.2 cm. A prostate core needle biopsy is performed. 2 areas of the same core are highlighted above. Which of the following statements is true?
- Cystoscopy evaluation is warranted, given that there is high grade urothelial carcinoma invading the prostate
- Findings are consistent with therapy related prostatic carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma combined with acinar adenocarcinoma
- Findings are consistent with melanoma
- Tumor should not be given a Gleason score
Board review style answer #2
B. Findings are consistent with therapy related prostatic carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma combined with acinar adenocarcinoma. The presence of a large cell neuroendocrine component (solid sheets of large cells with brisk mitotic activity and prominent nucleoli) and concurrent conventional adenocarcinoma, in the setting of antiandrogen receptor therapy, indicates treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma (tNEPC). Answers A and C are incorrect because although melanoma and high grade urothelial carcinoma may be in the differential diagnosis, the presence of a concurrent acinar prostatic adenocarcinoma on the same core, in the setting of antiandrogen therapy, is diagnostic of tNEPC and the neuroendocrine component is large cell type. Answer D is incorrect because this tumor should be given a Gleason score but only the acinar prostatic adenocarcinoma component should be considered for scoring purposes.
Comment Here
Reference: Treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma
Comment Here
Reference: Treatment related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma