Prostate gland & seminal vesicles

Atypical / intraductal lesions

Intraductal carcinoma


Editorial Board Member: Bonnie Choy, M.D.
Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Maria Tretiakova, M.D., Ph.D.
Virgilia Macias, M.D.
Andre Kajdacsy-Balla, M.D., Ph.D.

Last author update: 17 January 2025
Last staff update: 17 January 2025

Copyright: 2002-2025, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.

PubMed Search: Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate

Virgilia Macias, M.D.
Andre Kajdacsy-Balla, M.D., Ph.D.
Page views in 2024: 20,695
Page views in 2025 to date: 5,953
Cite this page: Macias V, Kajdacsy-Balla A. Intraductal carcinoma. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/prostateidc.html. Accessed April 1st, 2025.
Definition / general
  • An intra-acinar or intraductal neoplastic epithelial proliferation that has some features of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) but exhibits much greater architectural or cytological atypia, typically associated with high grade, high stage prostate carcinoma (Eur Urol 2016;70:106)
Essential features
  • High degree of cytological atypia, commonly with necrosis that fills prostatic ducts and acini
  • Usually associated with high grade and high stage invasive carcinoma
  • Appropriate to use immunohistochemistry to demonstrate presence of basal cells
  • Pure intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) without the presence of invasive carcinoma should not be graded (Adv Anat Pathol 2021;28:1)
  • IDC-P should be noted when observed with invasive prostate cancer
  • Incorporation of IDC-P into grading in cases with concomitant invasive carcinoma remains controversial (J Clin Transl Pathol 2023;3:26)
Terminology
  • Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P): currently recognized term
  • Ductal carcinoma in situ: not recommended
  • Acinar carcinoma in situ: not recommended
  • Low grade intraductal carcinoma: not recommended
ICD coding
  • ICD-O: 8500/2 - intraductal carcinoma
  • ICD-11: 2E67.5 & XH1H31 - carcinoma in situ of prostate & intraductal carcinoma, noninfiltrating, NOS
Epidemiology
Sites
  • Prostate ducts and acini
Pathophysiology
Etiology
  • No known causes to date
Diagnosis
  • Prostate core needle biopsy, prostatectomy or transurethral resection specimens
Laboratory
  • Elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA)
Radiology description
  • In situ disease not identified by imaging; microscopic diagnosis only
Prognostic factors
Case reports
Treatment
Gross description
  • Not seen on gross examination
Microscopic (histologic) description
Microscopic (histologic) images

Contributed by Erica Vormittag-Nocito, M.D. and Andre Kajdacsy-Balla, M.D., Ph.D.
Cribriform architecture

Cribriform architecture

Comedonecrosis

Comedonecrosis

Gleason pattern 5

Gleason pattern 5

Cribriform component

Cribriform component

PIN4 triple stain

PIN4 triple stain

Gleason pattern 5, p63

Gleason pattern 5, p63

Cytology description
  • Cytology is not performed for the diagnosis of this disease entity
Positive stains
Negative stains
Electron microscopy description
  • Electron microscopy is not used to diagnose this disease entity
Molecular / cytogenetics description
Sample pathology report
  • Prostate, core needle biopsy:
    • 1 out of 2 cores with intraductal carcinoma, measuring 10 mm out of 15 mm continuously and involving 66% of the core (see comment)
    • Negative for evidence of invasive carcinoma
    • Comment: Intraductal carcinoma without evidence of invasive carcinoma is highly associated with high grade invasive prostatic carcinoma at prostatectomy or rebiopsy. Rebiopsy may be clinically indicated.

  • Prostate, core needle biopsy:
    • Prostatic adenocarcinoma, grade group 2, Gleason score 3+4 involving 2 of 2 cores, measuring 8 mm of 12 mm in core #1 (66% core length involvement) and 2 mm of 14 mm in core #2 (14% core length involvement)
    • Intraductal carcinoma present
Differential diagnosis
Board review style question #1
Which of the following is true regarding intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P)?

  1. Basal cell layer is not present in intraductal carcinoma
  2. Intraductal carcinoma is a common finding in prostate biopsies
  3. Intraductal carcinoma should be graded based on the Gleason pattern scoring system
  4. PTEN mutations are common in intraductal carcinoma
Board review style answer #1
D. PTEN mutations are common in intraductal carcinoma. Intraductal carcinoma commonly has PTEN deletions seen by IHC. PTEN loss is seen in 69 - 89% of IDC-P cases and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of PTEN is seen in ~45% of IDC-P cases (Prostate 2016;76:394, Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2008;47:565). Answer C is incorrect because IDC-P without the presence of invasive carcinoma should not be assigned a Gleason grade. 2 differing recommendations exist regarding whether to grade or not when associated with invasive carcinoma: the 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) does not favor including IDC-P into the Gleason score, while the 2019 ISUP favors it. The 2022 5th edition of the WHO classification of tumors of the urinary and male genital systems has not endorsed either of these positions (Eur Urol 2021;79:3, Eur Urol 2022;82:469). Answer B is incorrect because IDC-P is found in ~14% of prostate biopsies that harbor concomitant invasive carcinoma. The incidence of IDC-P in prostate biopsies without associated invasive carcinoma has been reported to be 0.06 - 0.26% (Mod Pathol 2006;19:1528, Histopathology 2013;63:574, Eur Urol 2017;72:492, Eur Urol 2022;82:469). Answer A is incorrect because IDC-P is characterized by the presence of peripheral basal cells that can be highlighted by IHC when appropriate (Mod Pathol 2006;19:1528, J Clin Transl Pathol 2023;3:26).

Comment Here

Reference: Intraductal carcinoma
Board review style question #2


A 65 year old man had a radical prostatectomy for invasive carcinoma previously found on prostate biopsy. What do the above histology findings predict about this patient's clinical course?

  1. Patient has a higher probability of biochemical recurrence
  2. Patient is cured with prostatectomy alone
  3. Patient was overtreated as he did not need a prostatectomy
  4. Patient will do the same as other patients within his same grade group without this finding
Board review style answer #2
A. Patient has a higher probability of biochemical recurrence. Patients with intraductal carcinoma have higher stage, higher grade tumors with higher likelihood of recurrence and do worse when matched for grade group. IDC-P is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (Eur Urol 2022;82:469). Answer B is incorrect because rebiopsy within 3 months or definitive therapy is recommended in isolated IDC-P without invasive carcinoma and in IDC-P with invasive low grade carcinoma. In IDC-P cases associated with a high grade invasive tumor, current guidelines recommend surgery and adjuvant therapy (Yonsei Med J 2016;57:1054, Virchows Arch 2019;474:525). Answer C is incorrect because, given the clinical significance of the presence of IDC-P and its association with aggressive disease, radical therapy is the current recommendation (Curr Oncol Rep 2021;23:110). Answer D is incorrect because IDC-P is considered an independent adverse prognostic factor and is frequently associated with high grade and high stage invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma. Comedonecrosis has been associated with worse histopathological features on prostatectomies and is an independent predictor of poorer clinical outcome (Yonsei Med J 2016;57:1054, Virchows Arch 2019;474:525, Histopathology 2022;81:447, Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023;147:94).

Comment Here

Reference: Intraductal carcinoma
Back to top
Image 01 Image 02