Fallopian tubes & broad ligament

Fallopian tube mixed epithelial & mesenchymal tumors

Adenosarcoma



Last author update: 12 December 2024
Last staff update: 12 December 2024

Copyright: 2023-2024, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.

PubMed search: Adenosarcoma

Joshua J.X. Li, M.B.Ch.B.
Philip P. C. Ip, M.B.Ch.B.
Cite this page: Li JJX, Ip PPC. Adenosarcoma. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/fallopiantubesadenosarcoma.html. Accessed December 21st, 2024.
Definition / general
  • Biphasic neoplasm consisting of a malignant stromal component and a benign epithelial component
Essential features
  • Uncommon gynecological neoplasm that is exceedingly rare as a primary tumor in the fallopian tubes
  • Biphasic neoplasm with benign Müllerian epithelium surrounded by neoplastic stromal cells
  • Diagnosis is based on histological appearance and recognition of at times subtle, stromal atypia
Terminology
  • Müllerian adenosarcoma
ICD coding
  • ICD-O: 8933/3 - adenosarcoma
  • ICD-11: XH5544 - adenosarcoma
Epidemiology
Sites
  • Fallopian tubes
Pathophysiology
Etiology
  • Currently uncertain
Diagnosis
  • Diagnosed based on histological appearance
  • No specific immunohistochemical marker or molecular feature for diagnosis
Laboratory
  • No specific laboratory findings
Radiology description
Prognostic factors
  • TP53 mutation, high grade histology and sarcomatous overgrowth are associated with poor prognosis (J Pathol 2015;235:37)
  • Complete surgical excision is more difficult in fallopian tube / extrauterine adenosarcomas (Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022;41:82)
  • Case of low grade adenosarcoma reported to be disease free with salvage surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy after peritoneal recurrence (Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:412)
Case reports
Treatment
Gross description
  • Nodular, polypoid mass or papillary projections into tubal lumen
Microscopic (histologic) description
  • Biphasic tumor with glands among a stromal component that forms thin papillae or broad polypoid fronds that project into mucosal surface
  • Epithelial component composed of endometrioid, ciliated, hobnail, mucinous or metaplastic squamous epithelium
  • Mesenchymal component is neoplastic
    • Periglandular condensation (cuffing) around epithelium
    • Low grade stroma commonly resembles endometrial type stroma
      • Distinguished from normal endometrial stroma by cellular periglandular cuffs and presence of mitotic figures (usually ≥ 4 mitoses per 10 high power fields in majority of cases)
    • High grade stroma is associated with greater nuclear atypia, more frequent mitosis, necrosis and hemorrhage, although stromal cells may be deceptively bland and sparsely cellular in the areas away from the glands
      • Sarcomatous overgrowth (> 25% of tumor composed of stromal component only) is more common in high grade adenosarcoma (71% in high grade versus 10% in low grade) (Mod Pathol 2022;35:1684)
    • Heterologous (5 - 26%) and sex cord-like differentiation (5%) can be seen (Mod Pathol 2022;35:1684, Diagn Pathol 2024;19:56)
  • Can be associated with endometriosis
Microscopic (histologic) images

Contributed by Joshua J.X. Li, M.B.Ch.B. and Philip P. C. Ip, M.B.Ch.B.
Adnexal tumor nodule

Adnexal tumor nodule

Biphasic pattern

Biphasic pattern

Bland epithelial component

Bland epithelial component

Periglandular condensation

Periglandular condensation

Stromal mitosis

Stromal mitosis


Stromal atypia

Stromal atypia

Malignant stroma

Malignant stroma

Variable stromal atypia

Variable stromal atypia

Serosal tumor nodule

Serosal tumor nodule

Smooth muscle actin

Smooth muscle actin

Positive stains
Negative stains
Sample pathology report
  • Fallopian tube, salpingectomy:
    • High grade adenosarcoma (see comment)
    • Comment: Sections show a biphasic tumor consisting of bland ciliated epithelium arranged in compressed glands and periglandular cuff of atypical stromal cells. The latter are spindled and occasionally epithelioid, displaying moderate to marked nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia and pleomorphism with frequent mitotic figures. Necrosis is identified. The features are those of a high grade adenosarcoma.
Differential diagnosis
  • Adenomyoma:
    • Majority of stroma composed of smooth muscle
    • Lacks periglandular cuff of stromal cells
  • Endometriosis:
    • Lacks prominent periglandular cuff of stromal cells
    • Presence of small arterioles similar to those in the proliferative phase endometrium
  • Carcinosarcoma:
    • Epithelial component neoplastic with malignant histological features
    • Stromal component typically high grade
  • Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ovary):
    • Lacks epithelial component
    • Specific molecular aberrations (low grade: PHF1, SUZ12; high grade: BCOR, YWHAE)
  • Fibrosarcoma (ovary):
    • Marked atypia with numerous and often abnormal mitoses
    • Lacks epithelial component
Board review style question #1

Which of the following is useful in differentiating adenosarcoma from carcinosarcoma of the uterine adnexa?

  1. Heterologous sarcomatous differentiation
  2. Involvement of the uterine corpus
  3. Periglandular cuffing of atypical stromal cells surrounding bland epithelial component
  4. Stromal hypercellularity and atypia
  5. TP53 sequencing for detection of TP53 mutation
Board review style answer #1
C. Periglandular cuffing of atypical stromal cells surrounding bland epithelial component. The primary differentiation between adenosarcoma and carcinosarcoma is based on histologic features including architecture. Answer A is incorrect because heterologous sarcomatous differentiation can be observed in both entities. Answer E is incorrect because TP53 mutation can be present in both entities. Answer B is incorrect because involvement of the uterine corpus does not favor adenosarcoma over carcinosarcoma or otherwise. Answer D is incorrect because hypercellularity and atypia can be seen in both entities.

Comment Here

Reference: Adenosarcoma
Back to top
Image 01 Image 02