Table of Contents
Definition / general | Essential features | Terminology | ICD coding | Epidemiology | Sites | Pathophysiology | Etiology | Clinical features | Diagnosis | Prognostic factors | Case reports | Treatment | Gross description | Microscopic (histologic) description | Microscopic (histologic) images | Positive stains | Negative stains | Electron microscopy description | Molecular / cytogenetics description | Sample pathology report | Differential diagnosis | Additional references | Board review style question #1 | Board review style answer #1 | Board review style question #2 | Board review style answer #2Cite this page: Kontosis A, Barroeta JE. Invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/cervixinvasivestratifiedmucincarc.html. Accessed December 24th, 2024.
Definition / general
- Variant of the mucinous type of human papillomavirus (HPV) associated adenocarcinoma of the cervix
Essential features
- Second most common type of HPV associated cervical adenocarcinoma
- Considered the invasive counterpart of stratified mucin producing intraepithelial lesion (SMILE) and is associated with high risk HPV infection (most commonly HPV 18 followed by HPV 16)
- Typical histologic features include solid invasive nests of stratified mucinous cells often exhibiting peripheral nuclear palisading, apoptotic bodies, mitoses and an associated neutrophilic infiltrate
- May demonstrate morphologic variability including areas of usual type endocervical adenocarcinoma; it can be mixed with other types of carcinomas
- Both pure and mixed tumors show increased rates of local recurrence and lymph node metastasis and a worse prognosis compared to usual type HPV associated adenocarcinoma
Terminology
- Stratified mucin producing carcinoma
- i-SMILE and iSMILE
- Invasive stratified mucinous carcinoma (iSMC)
- Invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma (ISMC)
- HPV associated endocervical adenocarcinoma, invasive stratified mucin producing type
ICD coding
- ICD-O
- ICD-11: 2C77.1 & XH1S75 - adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri & mucinous adenocarcinoma
Epidemiology
- ~3 - 10% of cervical adenocarcinomas and 1% of all cervical carcinomas (Am J Surg Pathol 2018;42:214, Cancer Epidemiol 2023;86:102442, Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2021;18:685)
- Second most common type of HPV associated cervical adenocarcinoma, after usual type (Cancer Epidemiol 2023;86:102442)
- Mean age: 40 years old (range: 22 - 78 years), 80% were younger than 50 years old in representative study (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:1374)
- 15 years older on average compared to patients with only intraepithelial disease (SMILE with or without high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL]) in one study (Am J Surg Pathol 2016;40:262)
Sites
- Arises at the transformation zone of the cervix
Pathophysiology
- Considered the invasive counterpart of stratified mucin producing intraepithelial lesion of the cervix (Am J Surg Pathol 2016;40:262)
- Believed to arise from cervical reserve cells after persistent infection by high risk HPV serotypes (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:873)
- Basally located stem cells under columnar epithelium near the squamocolumnar junction (transformation zone); can be differentiated into both squamous and glandular cells as well as express squamous and glandular lineage specific markers, respectively (Cancer Med 2020;9:6330)
- Supporting evidence
- Expression of p63 and CK5/6 in the peripheral palisading cells in ISMC
- Distinct stemness and epithelial - mesenchymal transition (EMT) prone features of ISMC (Mod Pathol 2021;34:1738)
- Ability to present variable architectural and cytologic patterns (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:873)
- HPV targets cells capable of both squamous and columnar differentiation (Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:1414)
- Believed to arise from cervical reserve cells after persistent infection by high risk HPV serotypes (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:873)
Etiology
- Associated with high risk HPV infection (HPV 18 is the most common subtype, followed by HPV 16 and rarer subtypes [e.g., HPV 52, 45 and 59]) (Cancer Epidemiol 2023;86:102442)
Clinical features
- Abnormal vaginal bleeding is the most common presenting symptom (Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022;306:1703)
- Other reasons for diagnosis include follow up of abnormal Pap smears or high risk HPV testing, apparent cervical mass and other rare presentations (e.g., ascites with cytology features of adenocarcinoma) (Am J Surg Pathol 2016;40:262)
- Usually large size at presentation; in ~33% of cases, it has already spread to lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:1374)
- Significant risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis, particularly to the lungs (J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019;145:2573, Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:1374)
Diagnosis
- See HPV associated adenocarcinoma
- Abnormal Pap smear or high risk HPV testing results may lead, depending on risk assessment, to colposcopy and biopsy (J Low Genit Tract Dis 2020;24:102)
- Biopsy is the gold standard for the definite diagnosis
- Diagnostic criteria (WHO 5th edition)
- Essential
- Stromal invasion, either destructive or nondestructive
- Solid invasive nests of stratified mucinous cells
- Absence of endometrioid confirmatory features such as squamous metaplasia and endometriosis
- Desirable
- p16 overexpression
- HPV detection
- Negative ER, PR and usually vimentin
- Wild type p53
- Essential
Prognostic factors
- More aggressive clinical course as compared to usual type endocervical adenocarcinoma (Histopathology 2024;84:315)
- More likely to be higher grade, have larger size, advanced FIGO stage and lymph node metastasis
- Worse overall survival and shorter tumor recurrence
- 5 year overall survival (OS) (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:1374)
- 88.9% for FIGO stage I
- 30% for FIGO stages II - IV
- 5 year recurrence free survival (RFS)
- 73.9% for FIGO stage I
- 38.1% for FIGO stages II - IV
- Prognostic factors (affecting overall survival and recurrence free survival)
- FIGO stage
- Tumor size
- Lymph node metastasis
- Local recurrence
- Type of surgical treatment (if lymph node dissection is included or not) appears to affect RFS but not OS (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:1374)
- Pure iSMCs when compared with mixed iSMCs are more likely to have
- Larger size (Histopathology 2024;84:315)
- No difference in OS and RFS (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:1374)
Case reports
- 30 year old woman with contact bleeding, 47 year old woman at routine physical examination and 64 year old woman with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding (Cancer Biol Ther 2019;20:1403)
- 43 year old woman with unexplained vaginal bleeding (Asian J Surg 2023;46:575)
- 49 year old woman with contact bleeding and previous atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) result on Pap smear (Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2020;13:2187)
Treatment
- No consensus for specific treatment of ISMC; treat like other cervical adenocarcinomas (Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022;306:1703)
- It is suggested that ISMC should be treated with radical surgery and lymph node dissection, regardless of the size of tumor and proportion of iSMC component in mixed tumors, since extent of surgery (inclusion or not of lymph node dissection) can affect prognosis (indicated by RFS data) (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:1374)
- Potential role of PD-1 / PDL1 immunotherapy, since ISMC (70 - 100%) shows overexpression of PDL1, with combined positive score (CPS): 30 - 100 and 1 - 92 in 2 studies (Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2021;18:685)
- Amplification of ERBB2 or c-erB2 overexpression observed in few cases
- Possible role of targeted therapy (Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2021;18:685)
Gross description
- Typically polypoid or exophytic; can be endophytic (Hum Pathol 2016:55:174)
- Size range: indiscernible to 7.5 cm (mean: ~3 cm) (Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022;306:1703)
- White or yellow-gray cut surfaces, with focal hemorrhage and necrosis (Hum Pathol 2016:55:174)
Microscopic (histologic) description
- Classic ISMC features
- Solid infiltrative nests of stratified mucinous cells
- Mucin can be variable, ranging from mucin poor to mucin rich tumors
- Distinct nuclear palisading at the periphery of the nests
- Bland (usually mild to moderate pleomorphic), oval or round nuclei with indistinct nucleoli
- Easily identified mitotic figures and apoptotic bodies
- Intratumoral and peritumoral neutrophilic infiltrates
- May have adjacent foci of stratified mucin producing intraepithelial lesion (Am J Surg Pathol 2016;40:262)
- Solid infiltrative nests of stratified mucinous cells
- Can present as pure ISMC (ISMC ≥ 90% of tumor) or mixed with other carcinomas (mixed ISMC) (ISMC ≥ 10% and < 90%) (Histopathology 2024;84:315)
- Usual type adenocarcinoma (most common) followed by adenosquamous, mucinous adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified and rarely neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:1374)
- Other rare morphologic features have been described
- Architecture patterns: insular, trabecular, glandular, solid, papillary, micropapillary and single cells
- Cytoplasm can have intracellular mucin and also be glassy-like, clear, delicately eosinophilic, dense eosinophilic (giving a squamoid appearance), histiocytoid or with signet ring features
- Bizarre nuclear atypia, extravasated pools of mucin and hyaline-like globules have been reported (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:873)
- Invasion may be expansile or destructive
- Silva type C is by far the most common type of growth pattern, followed by Silva type B and Silva type A patterns (Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022;306:1703, Histopathology 2024;84:315, Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:873)
- For Silva system classification, see HPV associated adenocarcinoma
- Overlying intraepithelial lesions can be identified if not overgrown by the tumor
- Most commonly stratified mucin producing intraepithelial lesion but also HSIL and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or a combination (Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:873)
Microscopic (histologic) images
Positive stains
- p16: all cases (strong, diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic block-like positivity)
- CAM 5.2, CK8, CK18 and CK7
- CEA: cytoplasmic with variable staining (Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2021;18:685)
- Ki67: high
- PAS, mucicarmine and Alcian blue: highlight the intracytoplasmic mucin (Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2021;18:685)
- Partially positive for IMP3 (Hum Pathol 2016:55:174)
- PDL1: positive in 70 - 100% of cases, expressed by CPS (Histopathology 2024;84:315, Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2021;18:685)
Negative stains
- CK5/6, p63, p40: mostly negative but can show patchy positivity, especially in the peripheral cells of neoplastic nests, regardless of the presence of palisading (Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022;306:1703, Hum Pathol 2016:55:174)
- PAX8: can show patchy weak positivity (Mod Pathol 2021;34:1738)
- SOX2: negative in most neoplastic cells, strong positivity in the peripheral cells of the neoplastic nests (Histopathology 2024;84:315)
- SOX17: may be focally positive (Histopathology 2024;84:315)
Electron microscopy description
- Stratified structure
- Cells with elongated and irregularly shaped nuclei
- Abundant mitochondria and rough endoplasmic reticulum in the cytoplasm
- Some cells with intracytoplasmic mucous vacuoles
- Primitive cell junctions present but without tonofilaments (Hum Pathol 2016:55:174)
Molecular / cytogenetics description
- HPV ISH with nuclear positivity; HPV 18 E7 PCR is the most common product (Hum Pathol 2016:55:174)
- Low mutational burden (average mutation rate is 5.9 mutations per lesion) and microsatellite stable status (J Transl Med 2022;20:187, Mod Pathol 2021;34:1738)
- Different results from a limited number of studies
- Whole exome analysis in 8 cases showed (J Transl Med 2022;20:187)
- MUC4 mutations in pure ISMCs
- DMD (encodes dystrophin protein) and DMKN mutations in mixed ISMCs
- Gene alterations in epithelial - mesenchymal transition (EMT) related, Notch and Wnt signaling pathways consistent with EMT capabilities of ISMCs
- Targeted sequence analysis of 10 cases showed (Mod Pathol 2021;34:1738)
- TWIST1, AKT2, GNAQ, PTEN and SF3B1 mutations only in pure ISMCs
- STK11, MET, ERB2 and KMT2D EMT related mutations, in both pure and mixed ISMCs
- STK11, MET, FANCA and PALB2 mutations preferentially expressed in ISMCs compared to endocervical adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)
- Targeted sequence of 8 cases showed (Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2021;18:685)
- ERBB3, KRAS, ERBB2, PIK3CA and GNAS mutations
- ERBB2 amplification in 1 case
- Whole exome analysis in 8 cases showed (J Transl Med 2022;20:187)
Sample pathology report
- Uterus, cervix, bilateral fallopian tubes and ovaries, radical hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-ophorectomy and (pelvic) lymph node dissection:
- HPV associated endocervical adenocarcinoma, pure / mixed (invasive) stratified mucin producing carcinoma (percentage%) and usual type adenocarcinoma (percentage%) (see comment)
- Size: __ cm in greatest dimension
- Silva A / B / C pattern of invasion
- Depth of invasion: __ mm (superficial third, middle third or deep third of cervical wall)
- Lymphovascular invasion present / absent
- Associated in situ lesions (AIS, SMILE or HSIL) present
- Surgical resection margins negative for in situ and invasive carcinoma (see synoptic report)
- TNM and FIGO staging
- Comment: Invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma is a variant of mucinous type of HPV associated adenocarcinomas of the cervix and it has been associated with a higher risk of lymph node metastases, higher risk of recurrence and a worse prognosis.
Differential diagnosis
- Cervical adenosquamous carcinoma (Int J Gynecol Pathol 2023;42:259):
- Cervical mucoepidermoid carcinoma:
- Cervical adenocarcinoma, usual type:
- Mucinous cells make up 0 - 50% of tumor
- May show papillary and micropapillary growth
- Cervical squamous cell carcinoma:
- SMILE (noninvasive lesion):
- No evidence of stromal invasion
- Microglandular hyperplasia:
Additional references
Board review style question #1
Which of the following statements is true regarding the cervical carcinoma shown above?
- HPV 16 is the most common identifiable HPV subtype
- It is considered the invasive counterpart of stratified mucin producing intraepithelial lesion (SMILE) of the cervix
- It is the most common type of HPV associated cervical adenocarcinoma
- It rarely shows lymph node metastasis
Board review style answer #1
B. It is considered the invasive counterpart of stratified mucin producing intraepithelial lesion (SMILE) of the cervix. As the name implies, invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma (ISMC) shows morphologic similarities with the stratified mucin producing intraepithelial lesions of the cervix, which can be identified in the nearby mucosa and are considered precursor lesions. Answer A is incorrect because ISMC is most commonly associated with HPV subtype 18. Answer C is incorrect because usual type endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA) is the most common HPV associated cervical adenocarcinoma. Answer D is incorrect because it frequently metastasizes to the lymph node and ~33% of patients can present with lymph node metastasis.
Comment Here
Reference: Invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma
Comment Here
Reference: Invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma
Board review style question #2
Which immunohistochemical profile would most likely be seen in an invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma (ISMC) of the cervix?
- PAX8- / p16- / p40- / CK7-
- PAX8+ / p16- / p40- / CK7+
- PAX8- / p16+ / p40+ / CK7+
- PAX8- / p16+ / p40- / CK7+
Board review style answer #2
D. PAX8- / p16+ / p40- / CK7+. Invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma of the cervix (ISMC) shows positivity for CK7 and p16 (block-like) and is negative for PAX8 (can be focally positive). p40 IHC can sometimes highlight the palisading nuclei at the periphery of the neoplastic nests but is negative for the other neoplastic cells. Answer A is incorrect because ISMC is an HPV associated adenocarcinoma and thus stains positive for p16. CK7 is also positive in ISMC. Answer B is incorrect because this immunohistochemical profile can be seen in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, among other diagnoses. Answer C is incorrect because this immunohistochemical profile is consistent with HPV associated cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Comment Here
Reference: Invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma
Comment Here
Reference: Invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma