Table of Contents
Definition / general | Essential features | Terminology | ICD coding | Epidemiology | Sites | Pathophysiology | Etiology | Clinical features | Diagnosis | Radiology description | Prognostic factors | Case reports | Treatment | Gross description | Microscopic (histologic) description | Microscopic (histologic) images | Positive stains | Sample pathology report | Differential diagnosis | Additional references | Board review style question #1 | Board review style answer #1 | Board review style question #2 | Board review style answer #2Cite this page: Magnetta EJ, Bachert SE. Secretory change. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/breastpseudolactionalhyperplasia.html. Accessed December 4th, 2024.
Definition / general
- Pregnancy-like lactational changes of glands and terminal ducts in nonpregnant, nonlactating women
Essential features
- Alteration that occurs in nonpregnant, nonlactating women
- Vast majority are incidental findings
- Histologically similar to lactational changes
Terminology
- Pregnancy-like change
- Pseudolactational change
ICD coding
- ICD-10: N64.9 - disorder of breast, unspecified
Epidemiology
- Incidental finding in 2 - 3% of core biopsies
- May be associated with calcifications
- Women, with mean age of 44 years
- May be identified in men (Clin Breast Cancer 2015;15:e171)
Sites
- Breast
Pathophysiology
- Pathophysiology is not known
Etiology
- Exact etiology is not known
- May be associated with exogenous hormone use, antipsychotics, antihypertensives and other medication use (Am J Clin Pathol 1987;87:23, Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:74, JBR-BTR 2013;96:25)
Clinical features
- May be isolated or multifocal
- Atypical secretory change has been reported (Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:789)
- May be associated with atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ (Clin Breast Cancer 2015;15:e171)
- Association with invasive carcinoma is rare (Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2016;59:126, Onkologie 2011;34:448)
Diagnosis
- Majority are clinically silent and incidental microscopic findings
Radiology description
- May be associated with calcifications on mammography
Prognostic factors
- Usually an incidental finding with no known impact on prognosis
Case reports
- 45 year old woman with suspicious microcalcifications on screening mammogram and 75 year old woman on antihypertensives with microlobulated mass on mammogram (JBR-BTR 2013;96:25)
- 61 year old man on spironolactone with a unilateral breast mass (Clin Breast Cancer 2015;15:e171)
- 70 year old woman on exogenous estrogen with left breast pain (Onkologie 2011;34:448)
- 31 women with with focal pregnancy-like changes in the breast (Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A 1977;85:931)
Treatment
- Treatment not indicated unless associated with atypia, in which excision is recommended
Gross description
- Not grossly identifiable
Microscopic (histologic) description
- Dilated and enlarged terminal duct lobular units
- Hobnailed and enlarged luminal cells with prominent cytoplasmic vacuolization
- Luminal cell nuclei will be uniform and may have prominent nucleoli
- Little to no intraluminal secretions
- Reference: Schnitt: Biopsy Interpretation of the Breast, 3rd Edition, 2017
Microscopic (histologic) images
Positive stains
- Granules in the cytoplasm are positive for S100 and diastase resistant PAS (periodic acid-Schiff)
Sample pathology report
- Right breast, needle core biopsy:
- Breast tissue with focal secretory change
Differential diagnosis
- Lactating adenoma:
- Well circumscribed mass composed of actively secreting glands
- Seen in women during and after pregnancy
- Secretory change tends to lack circumscription and is found outside of the context of pregnancy
- Lobular hyperplasia:
- Not well circumscribed physiologic expansion of lobules
- Features of secretory change such as hobnailed luminal cells with vacuolated cytoplasm are not seen
- Delayed involution of lactation:
- Hyperplastic involuting lobules that may be associated with calcifications and a background of inflammatory cells
- This would be within the context of pregnancy, of which secretory change is not
- Secretory carcinoma of the breast:
- Rare, well circumscribed mass with cytologic atypia and ETV6::NTRK3 gene fusion in 95% of cases
- Secretory change is unlikely to present as a mass, will not have atypia to the same degree and will lack the ETV6::NTRK3 fusion
- Micropapillary pattern of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS):
- Neoplastic intraductal epithelial proliferation with micropapillae that project into the duct lumen
- Secretory change is not clonal and will not have a monotonous appearance as seen in low grade DCIS nor will it have atypia as seen in high grade DCIS
- Atypical pregnancy-like change:
- Glandular cells tend to have relatively reduced vacuolated cytoplasm, greater nuclear atypia and a higher N:C ratio than that seen in normal secretory change
- Colloid-like intraluminal secretions are often seen
- Can exhibit micropapillary growth
- Secretory change will have an abundance of vacuolated cytoplasm and a lower N:C ratio without atypia
Additional references
Board review style question #1
A nonpregnant, nonlactating female underwent a core needle biopsy of the breast for calcifications identified on screening mammography. Which of the following features is the pictured lesion typically associated with?
- Abundant vacuolated cytoplasm
- Clinically palpable mass
- Invasive carcinoma
- Pronounced cytologic atypia
Board review style answer #1
A. Abundant vacuolated cytoplasm. The picture demonstrates secretory change of the breast, which has dilated terminal duct lobular units with hobnailed luminal cells and prominent vacuolization of the cytoplasm.
Answer B is incorrect because secretory change is usually an incidental finding or can be associated with calcifications on mammography. Answer D is incorrect because the luminal cells will have uniform nuclei and prominent nucleoli with no significant cytologic atypia. Answer C is incorrect because only rare case reports have been associated with invasive carcinoma. The vast majority of these lesions are incidental findings.
Comment Here
Reference: Secretory change
Comment Here
Reference: Secretory change
Board review style question #2
Which of the following features / settings is true of secretory change?
- Circumscribed mass of glands composed of cells with eosinophilic vacuolated cytoplasm and monomorphic round vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli, often containing colloid-like intraluminal secretions
- Clonal intraductal proliferation of cells with nuclear atypia arranged in micropapillary architecture
- Noncircumscribed focus of glands with hobnailed cells with abundant vacuolated cytoplasm in a patient with exogenous hormone use
- Well circumscribed mass of glands with hobnailed cells with abundant vacuolated cytoplasm and secretions seen during pregnancy
Board review style answer #2
C. Noncircumscribed focus of glands with hobnailed cells with abundant vacuolated cytoplasm in a patient with exogenous hormone use. This answer is correct because it summarizes the histologic features of secretory change in the breast in a nonlactating patient. Secretory change may be associated with exogenous hormone or other medication use.
Answer D is incorrect because the context of pregnancy and a well circumscribed mass of actively secreting cells describes a lactating adenoma. Answer A is incorrect because monomorphic cells, nuclear atypia and colloid-like intraluminal secretions are seen in secretory carcinoma rather than secretory change. Answer B is incorrect because secretory change is not a clonal intraductal proliferation and does not have atypia. This describes micropapillary ductal carcinoma in situ.
Comment Here
Reference: Secretory change
Comment Here
Reference: Secretory change