Table of Contents
Definition / general | Essential features | Terminology | ICD coding | Epidemiology | Sites | Pathophysiology | Etiology | Clinical features | Diagnosis | Prognostic factors | Case reports | Treatment | Gross description | Gross images | Microscopic (histologic) description | Microscopic (histologic) images | Cytology description | Positive stains | Negative stains | Molecular / cytogenetics description | Sample pathology report | Differential diagnosis | Additional references | Board review style question #1 | Board review style answer #1Cite this page: Sciallis AP. Cystic hypersecretory carcinoma. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/breastmalignantcystichypersecretoryinvasive.html. Accessed December 26th, 2024.
Definition / general
- Cystic hypersecretory carcinoma (CHC) is a variant of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) characterized by a variably cystic, intraductal proliferation of epithelial cells with secretory features and intraductal secretory material resembling thyroid colloid
- First described in 1984 by Rosen and Scott as cystic hypersecretory duct carcinoma (Am J Surg Pathol 1984;8:31)
Essential features
- Presence of dilated ducts filled with characteristic thyroid colloid-like secretion
- Architectural (i.e., micropapillary architecture) and nuclear atypia commensurate with a diagnosis of DCIS
- Background breast tissue with other forms of cystic hypersecretory change
Terminology
- Cystic hypersecretory carcinoma (CHC) fundamentally is an in situ process; however, terminology can be confusing to both clinicians and pathologists because it does not outright indicate that it is in situ
- Synonymous with cystic hypersecretory carcinoma in situ (CHCIS) and cystic hypersecretory DCIS (CH DCIS)
- Although CHC will be the abbreviation used for the purposes of this section, some groups prefer the term cystic hypersecretory ductal carcinoma in situ because it reinforces that the lesion is not invasive carcinoma and should be managed like DCIS
ICD coding
Epidemiology
- Rare; although the incidence and prevalence of CHC is unknown, it likely accounts for ≤ 1% of all cases of DCIS
Sites
- CHC can be unifocal or multifocal and often arises in a spectrum of other cystic hypersecretory lesions
Pathophysiology
- Not well understood as it is a rare variant of DCIS
- In one case series, TP53 mutations were identified in 3 (of 4) lesions of atypical cystic hypersecretory hyperplasia (atypical CHH) (Histopathology 2023;83:989)
Etiology
- Unknown
- CHC often arises in a spectrum of hypersecretory lesions such as cystic hypersecretory hyperplasia (CHH) and atypical CHH; in some cases, there may be background lactational-like / pregnancy-like change as well
- Despite morphologic similarities to lactational change, there is no consistent relationship between CHC and lactation
Clinical features
- Patient age
- Depends on the case series but usually is around 55 - 60 years
- In one case series, the average age of affected patients was 62.8 years (range: 47 - 79 years) (Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:45)
- Gender
- At this time, CHC has only been reported in female patients
- Presenting symptoms and physical examination findings
- CHC can be completely asymptomatic but physical examination findings include a mass or nipple discharge (Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140:644)
- Breast imaging findings
- Can disclose a cystic mass, calcifications and asymmetry / distortion
- In one series, the most common finding was a mass (Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:45)
Diagnosis
- Core biopsy or excisional biopsy
Prognostic factors
- At this point in time, the behavior of CHC does not appear to differ significantly from other types of DCIS and thus is influenced by estrogen receptor (ER) biomarker status, nuclear grade and presence of comedo type necrosis
Case reports
- 40 year old woman with a large, ill defined cystic breast mass (Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:e79)
- 49 year old woman with a palpable mass and no history of breast disease (J Clin Ultrasound 2004;32:29)
- 72 year old woman with a retroareolar mass in the left breast for 3 years (Cytopathology 2000;11:513)
Treatment
- Complete surgical excision with endocrine therapy depending on biomarker profile
- Of note, when cystic hypersecretory hyperplasia (CHH) is encountered on core biopsy, re-excision is recommended because CHC often occurs in a background of other types of cystic hypersecretory lesions (including CHH and atypical CHH)
Gross description
- CHC cannot be reliably diagnosed solely via gross assessment, as features can overlap with fibrocystic change
- Grossly, CHC shows variably sized microcysts filled with gelatinous fluid
- Presence of a solid mass in association with cystic spaces should alert the pathologist that there could be an invasive carcinoma
Microscopic (histologic) description
- Low power
- At low power, affected lobules are distorted, cystically dilated and filled with eosinophilic, colloid-like material
- Like other forms of DCIS, the lesion has a lobular distribution
- Colloid-like secretion resembles thyroid colloid and can show scalloping near the cells lining the duct
- Cracking in the secretory material has been noted to resemble Venetian blinds in that the cracks are usually parallel to each other
- Secretion is hypocellular, consisting of a few foamy macrophages
- Calcifications are common but comedonecrosis is uncommon
- Because CHC often arises in a spectrum of other hypersecretory lesions, close attention to the low power microarchitecture of the cells lining the ducts is important
- CHC often shows complex pseudostratification or micropapillary architecture, whereas the cells in CHH are often flat and form a single layer
- Solid architecture has also been noted
- At low power, affected lobules are distorted, cystically dilated and filled with eosinophilic, colloid-like material
- Higher power
- Cells in CHH are hyperchromatic, disorganized and pseudostratified
- N:C ratios are increased relative to background CHH
- Mitotic figures are present
- Degree of nuclear atypia in most cases ranges from intermediate to high grade and resembles the degree of atypia observed in cases of clinging DCIS (Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:45)
- Other features
- In some cases, CHC may show periductal chronic inflammation
- Other types of intraductal hyperplasia may coexist with CHC, including intraductal lobular neoplasia and apocrine metaplasia
- CHC can show microinvasive carcinoma; most cases of invasive carcinoma arising in CHC are high grade and triple negative
- In some cases, there may be background lactational-like / pregnancy-like change as well
Microscopic (histologic) images
Contributed by Andrew P. Sciallis, M.D. and Kristen E. Muller, D.O.
Cytology description
- Cytology of CHC has not been well described
- In 2 case reports, neoplastic cells formed micropapillary clusters were observed (Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:e79, Cytopathology 2000;11:513)
Positive stains
- Estrogen receptor (ER)
- Positive in most cases of CHC; however, there is variability in the intensity and percentage of positive cells
- Progesterone receptor (PR)
- Positive in a subset of cases of CHC but the percentage of positive cases is less than ER positive cases
- HER2
- Usually negative but in one case series, HER2 was positive in the invasive component in 2 (of 5) (Histopathology 2005;46:43)
- Androgen receptor (AR)
- Positive in a subset of cases
- Broad spectrum CK
- Low molecular weight CK
- Myoepithelial markers
- p63 and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain highlight myoepithelial cells in the majority of cases
- Of note, in one case series, a case that morphologically was identical to CHC was negative for p63 and smooth muscle myosin (Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:45)
Molecular / cytogenetics description
- Very little is known concerning molecular abnormalities in CHC
Sample pathology report
- Breast, left, core biopsy:
- Cystic hypersecretory ductal carcinoma in situ, intermediate nuclear grade
Differential diagnosis
- Other cystic hypersecretory lesions (CHH, atypical CHH):
- This can be diagnostically challenging as cystic hypersecretory lesions exhibit a spectrum of atypia ranging from benign (CHH) to in situ carcinoma (CHC)
- Micropapillary architecture, prominent pseudostratification and nuclear atypia are observed in CHC
- If a cystic hypersecretory lesion exhibits nuclear atypia but lacks significant micropapillary architecture or is small in extent, then it is best classified as atypical CHH
- This can be diagnostically challenging as cystic hypersecretory lesions exhibit a spectrum of atypia ranging from benign (CHH) to in situ carcinoma (CHC)
- Other forms of DCIS:
- Clinging DCIS and CHC can overlap morphologically and both can contain intraluminal contents
- In clinging DCIS, the intraluminal contents usually represent comedonecrosis and do not appear colloid-like
- Management of CHC and DCIS is the same and largely depends on nuclear grade, necrosis, ER status and clinical extent
- Clinging DCIS and CHC can overlap morphologically and both can contain intraluminal contents
- Secretory carcinoma:
- Both secretory carcinoma and CHC feature eosinophilic secretory material and secretory carcinoma can have cystic architecture
- Secretory carcinoma often shows a variety of other architectural arrangements, including solid and microcystic
- Secretory carcinoma often is grossly circumscribed; however, microscopically there are infiltrative margins and loss of a lobular distribution
- Secretory carcinoma usually is triple negative but strongly positive for S100 and most cases have a ETV6::NTRK3 translocation
- Both secretory carcinoma and CHC feature eosinophilic secretory material and secretory carcinoma can have cystic architecture
- Apocrine metaplasia:
- Ducts involved by apocrine metaplasia often are cystically dilated and may show tufting that appears micropapillary
- Apocrine metaplastic cells possess granular eosinophilic cytoplasm
- Ducts with apocrine metaplasia may contain some secretory material but it isn’t nearly as prominent as it is in cystic hypersecretory lesions
- Ducts involved by apocrine metaplasia often are cystically dilated and may show tufting that appears micropapillary
- Juvenile papillomatosis (JP):
- Both CHC and JP can be mass forming and show cystically dilated ducts
- Intraductal secretion in JP is not brightly eosinophilic or colloid-like
- Cysts in JP contain florid usual ductal hyperplasia and other patterns of proliferative breast changes
- Both CHC and JP can be mass forming and show cystically dilated ducts
Additional references
Board review style question #1
Which of the following statements regarding cystic hypersecretory carcinoma (CHC) is true?
- CHC often arises in a background of other cystic hypersecretory lesions
- Clinical course of CHC is much more aggressive than other types of DCIS
- Invasive carcinoma arising in CHC usually represents secretory carcinoma
- Most cases of CHC are ER negative
- Most cases of CHC arise in lactating patients
Board review style answer #1
A. CHC often arises in a background of other cystic hypersecretory lesions. Answer B is incorrect because although literature concerning the clinical behavior of CHC is not robust, its behavior is not significantly different from other forms of DCIS. Answer D is incorrect because most cases of CHC are ER positive. Answer E is incorrect because most cases of CHC arise in nonlactating, often postmenopausal, patients. Answer C is incorrect because invasive carcinoma arising in CHC tends to be poorly differentiated and morphologically looks different than secretory carcinoma.
Comment Here
Reference: Cystic hypersecretory carcinoma
Comment Here
Reference: Cystic hypersecretory carcinoma