Bladder & urothelial tract

Urothelial neoplasms - noninvasive

Carcinoma in situ


Resident / Fellow Advisory Board: Alcino Pires Gama, M.D.
Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Maria Tretiakova, M.D., Ph.D.
Ngoc-Nhu Jennifer Nguyen, M.D.
Michelle R. Downes, M.D.

Last author update: 12 August 2024
Last staff update: 12 August 2024

Copyright: 2003-2025, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.

PubMed Search: Bladder carcinoma in situ

Ngoc-Nhu Jennifer Nguyen, M.D.
Michelle R. Downes, M.D.
Page views in 2024: 31,469
Page views in 2025 to date: 7,631
Cite this page: Nguyen NNJ, Downes MR. Carcinoma in situ. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/bladdercis.html. Accessed March 28th, 2025.
Definition / general
Essential features
  • CIS is defined as high grade malignant urothelial cells with severe nuclear atypia at low to intermediate power and no papillary formation
  • Characterized by nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia and loss of cellular polarity
  • CK20 full thickness staining, p53 overexpression / null phenotype and loss of CD44 expression are immunohistochemical findings supporting the diagnosis of urothelial CIS
  • Differential diagnoses include flat urothelial dysplasia, reactive / inflammatory urothelial dysplasia, therapy related dysplasia and shoulder lesion of a papillary urothelial carcinoma
  • Treatment typically consists of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy for bladder CIS, transurethral resection for urethral CIS and nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract CIS
Terminology
  • Flat urothelial carcinoma in situ
ICD coding
  • ICD-O: 8120/2 - urothelial carcinoma in situ
  • ICD-11
    • 2C91.0 & XH5GH8 - urothelial carcinoma of renal pelvis & urothelial carcinoma in situ
    • 2C92.0 & XH5GH8 - urothelial carcinoma of ureter & urothelial carcinoma in situ
    • 2C94.2 & XH5GH8 - urothelial carcinoma of bladder & urothelial carcinoma in situ
    • 2C93.2 & XH5GH8 - urothelial carcinoma of urethra or paraurethral gland & urothelial carcinoma in situ
    • 2C95.2 & XH5GH8 - urothelial carcinoma involving overlapping sites of urinary organs & urothelial carcinoma in situ
Epidemiology
Pathophysiology
  • CCDC138 mutation, TERT promoter mutation and p53 mutation are the most common genetic findings
  • DNA damage signaling related to APOBEC signature is a key signaling pathway in the progression of CIS (Nat Commun 2023;14:5670)
  • At least 1 potentially actionable genomic alteration is identified among the following genes in 92% of cases
    • TP53 / cell cycle pathway related genes, including TP53, MDM2 and CCND1
    • Genes encoding chromatin modifying proteins, including ARID1A, KDM6A and EP300 / CREBBP
    • DNA damage repair genes, including BRCA2, ATM and BRCA1
    • Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase / mitogen activated protein kinase pathway genes, including ERBB2, FGFR1 and PIK3CA (Am J Pathol 2020;190:323)
  • 46 gene expression signature, including upregulation of actionable genes MTOR, TYK2, AXIN1, CPT1B, GAK and PIEZO1 and downregulation of BRD2 and NDUFB2, was found in a multiomics profiling study (iScience 2024;27:109179)
  • Luminal-like phenotype (CK20+, CK5/6-), null phenotype (CK20-, CK5/6-) and mixed luminal-like / null phenotype in the majority of cases; basal-like subtype (CK20-, CK5 / 6+) in rare cases (Virchows Arch 2021;479:325, Virchows Arch 2018;472:749)
  • Positivity for predictive markers HER2 or ERβ in 91% of cases (Virchows Arch 2018;472:749)
  • Comparison with papillary urothelial carcinoma
    • Differences: most commonly luminal with overexpression of FOXA1 and downregulation of basal (CD44 and KRT14), immune (CXCL11) and neuronal (APLP1, MS1) markers (iScience 2024;27:109179)
    • Similarities: TERT, TP53, ERBB2 and APOBEC related pathway (UROMOL class 2a) and high immune cell infiltration (UROMOL class 2b) but with higher PD-1 levels
Etiology
Clinical features
Diagnosis
Laboratory
Radiology description
  • Wall thickening of the urinary tract (Eur Radiol 2022;32:3269)
  • Mass forming lesions can be seen in pure urothelial CIS located in the renal collecting system
Radiology images

Images hosted on other servers:

MRI

CT

Prognostic factors
Case reports
Treatment
Clinical images

Images hosted on other servers:
White light cystoscopy

White and blue light cystoscopy

Gross description
Gross images

Images hosted on other servers:
Erythematous changes

Erythematous changes

Frozen section description
Frozen section images

Contributed by Michelle R. Downes, M.D.
CIS involving ureteral margin CIS involving ureteral margin

CIS involving ureteral margin



Images hosted on other servers:
CIS involving ureteral margin

CIS involving ureteral margin

Microscopic (histologic) description
  • Cytological features
  • Architectural features
    • Loss of cellular polarity (urothelial cells lose their perpendicular orientation to the basement membrane)
    • Nuclear crowding with or without nuclear overlapping
    • Irregular thickness characterized by hyperplasia, attenuation or denudation
  • Patterns of urothelial CIS
    • Large cell pleomorphic: abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and nuclear pleomorphism
    • Large cell nonpleomorphic: abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm without nuclear pleomorphism
    • Small cell: scant eosinophilic cytoplasm without nuclear pleomorphism
    • Clinging: variable denudation of the urothelium with a patchy monolayer of atypical cells
    • Pagetoid: clusters or isolated atypical cells within the urothelium
    • Undermining / overriding: presence of atypical cells that undermine / override normal urothelium adjacent to another pattern of urothelial CIS
    • Micropapillary: slender tufts of CIS morphologically similar to serous borderline tumor of the ovary; absence of fibrovascular core (Hum Pathol 2012;43:2124)
    • Plasmacytoid: round nuclear shape with eccentric, enlarged nuclei shape and globular eosinophilic cytoplasm (Am J Surg Pathol 2019;43:1638)
    • With glandular differentiation: atypical urothelial cells characterized by columnar epithelium with apical cytoplasm (Am J Surg Pathol 2018;42:971)
  • Urothelial CIS may be seen in association with inflammation and vascular congestion of the underlying lamina propria (J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009;7:48)
Microscopic (histologic) images

Contributed by Michelle R. Downes and Sean R. Williamson, M.D.
Hyperchromasia and loss of polarity Hyperchromasia and loss of polarity

Hyperchromasia and loss of polarity

Denudation and vascular congestion

Denudation and vascular congestion

Mitotic figures

Mitotic figures

Adjacent benign urothelium

Adjacent benign urothelium

Large cell pleomorphic CIS

Large cell pleomorphic CIS


Clinging CIS Clinging CIS

Clinging CIS

Pagetoid CIS

Pagetoid CIS

Pagetoid CIS involving ureter margin

Pagetoid CIS involving ureter margin

Undermining CIS

Undermining CIS

CIS in von Brunn nest

CIS in von Brunn nest


Underlying inflamed lamina propria

Underlying inflamed lamina propria

Adjacent benign urothelium

Adjacent benign urothelium

Ureter CIS Ureter CIS

Ureter CIS

Ureter CIS with adjacent benign urothelium

Ureter CIS with adjacent benign urothelium

Ureter CIS with adjacent denuded urothelium

Ureter CIS with adjacent denuded urothelium


p53 overexpression

p53 overexpression

CK20 full thickness expression

CK20 full thickness expression

Loss of CD44 expression

Loss of CD44 expression

Elevated Ki67

Elevated Ki67

AMACR overexpression

AMACR overexpression


p53 expression in CIS versus benign urothelium

p53 expression in CIS versus benign urothelium

CK20 expression in CIS versus benign urothelium

CK20 expression in CIS versus benign urothelium

CD44 expression in CIS versus benign urothelium

CD44 expression in CIS versus benign urothelium

AMACR expression in CIS versus benign urothelium

AMACR expression
in CIS versus
benign
urothelium

Virtual slides

Images hosted on other servers:
Ureteric frozen section

Ureteric frozen section

Von Brunn nest involvement

Von Brunn nest involvement

Cytology description
  • Cytological findings of CIS are reported as positive for high grade urothelial carcinoma according to The Paris System (TPS)
    • 5 - 10 abnormal cells (ideally > 10)
    • High N:C ratio (≥ 0.7)
    • Moderate to severe hyperchromatic nuclei
    • Marked irregular nuclear membrane
    • Coarse / clumped chromatin
Cytology images

Contributed by Bonnie Choy, M.D.
High grade urothelial carcinoma High grade urothelial carcinoma High grade urothelial carcinoma High grade urothelial carcinoma High grade urothelial carcinoma

High grade urothelial carcinoma

Positive stains
Negative stains
Molecular / cytogenetics description
Videos

Urothelial CIS

Sample pathology report
  • Bladder, transurethral resection:
    • Carcinoma in situ present, Tis
    • Muscularis propria sampled

  • Bladder, transurethral resection:
    • Papillary urothelial carcinoma, high grade (grade 3/3 WHO 1973)
    • Negative for invasion, Ta
    • Muscularis propria sampled
    • Carcinoma in situ present (Tis) in separately submitted sample

  • Bladder and prostate, cystoprostatectomy:
    • Urothelial carcinoma, high grade
    • Invasion of bladder neck, prostate and bilateral seminal vesicle, pT4
    • Carcinoma in situ in prostatic urethra
    • Positive for lymphovascular space invasion
    • Margins positive: periprostatic soft tissue and en face urethral margin
    • 1 node, negative for carcinoma (0/1)

  • Kidney and ureter (right), nephroureterectomy:
    • Urothelial carcinoma, high grade, of distal ureter; 3.0 cm in maximum gross dimension
    • Invasion through ureteral wall into adipose tissue, pT3
    • Extension to inked soft tissue (adipose tissue) margins
    • Positive for lymphovascular space invasion
    • Carcinoma in situ present
    • En face ureteral margin and vasculature, negative for malignancy
    • Kidney with hydronephrosis, atrophy and chronic inflammation
Differential diagnosis
Board review style question #1

A 70 year old woman who presented with macroscopic hematuria underwent cystoscopy, which revealed a small, flat, erythematous lesion in the left lateral bladder wall. Transurethral resection of the bladder lesion was performed and showed enlarged urothelial cells with intraurothelial inflammatory cells. What is the best stain combination that can be used to distinguish urothelial carcinoma in situ from reactive atypia?

  1. AMACR, Ki67
  2. Ki67, CK20
  3. p53, CK20
  4. p63, GATA3
Board review style answer #1
C. p53, CK20. CK20 full thickness staining and aberrant p53 expression support the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma in situ versus reactive atypia. Answer A is incorrect because AMACR lacks sensitivity and Ki67 can be elevated in both urothelial carcinoma in situ and florid reactive urothelial atypia. Answer D is incorrect because GATA3 and p63 are positive in benign and neoplastic urothelium. Answer B is incorrect because Ki67 can be elevated in both urothelial carcinoma in situ and florid reactive urothelial atypia.

Comment Here

Reference: Carcinoma in situ
Board review style question #2
What morphologic findings are the most consistent with urothelial carcinoma in situ?

  1. Nuclear enlargement, denudation, ulceration, granulomatous inflammation, absence of papillary formation
  2. Nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, loss of cellular polarity, papillary formation
  3. Nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, nuclear contour irregularities, loss of cellular polarity, absence of papillary formation
  4. Nuclear enlargement, intraurothelial inflammation, round nuclei with fine chromatin, absence of papillary formation
Board review style answer #2
C. Nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, nuclear contour irregularities, loss of cellular polarity, absence of papillary formation. All these findings are consistent with urothelial carcinoma in situ. Answer D is incorrect because these findings are most consistent with reactive / inflammatory atypia. Answer A is incorrect because these findings are most consistent with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induced urothelial atypia. Answer B is incorrect because these findings are consistent with high grade papillary urothelial carcinoma.

Comment Here

Reference: Carcinoma in situ
Back to top
Image 01 Image 02