Home   Chapter Home   Jobs   Conferences   Fellowships   Books

 

 

 

 

Breast-malignant, males, children

Microinvasive carcinoma

 

Author: Nat Pernick, M.D, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.

Reviewer: Daniel Visscher, M.D., University of Michigan Hospitals, February 2009 (see Reviewers page)

Revised: 13 September 2009

Last major update: September 2009

Copyright: (c) 2002-2009, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.

 

Definition of microinvasion

=========================================================================

● Dominant lesion is not invasive, but there are 1+ separate small, microscopic foci of infiltration, each 1 mm or less in size

 

Terminology

=========================================================================

● “Minimal breast carcinoma” includes microinvasive carcinoma and DCIS

● Can confirm using myoepithelial stains (myoepithelial layer is not intact) and keratin (to observe infiltrative growth)

● Diagnosis requires certainty of invasion; if doubt remains after recuts and immunostains, call DCIS or suspicious

 

Epidemiology

=========================================================================

● Mean age 61 years

 

Clinical

=========================================================================

● Less than 1% of all breast cancers

● Usually detected by mammography due to abnormal calcifications in associated DCIS

● 72% associated with comedo DCIS, 89% with high nuclear grade and 89% with necrosis

● Sentinel lymph node dissection may be appropriate, although axillary nodal metastases occur in less than 10% (Breast J 2008;14:335, Breast 2008;17:395); controversial whether to perform complete axillary dissection if positive sentinel node (yes-Breast 2007;16:146, no-Am J Surg 2007;194:845)

● Commonly misdiagnosed, as true diagnosis is usually DCIS or T1a carcinoma (Cancer 2000;88:1403)

● In breast core needle biopsies, invasive carcinomas 1 mm or less are rare, are associated with DCIS and ADH, and often with large invasive foci at excision (Archives 2004;128:996)

● Report number of foci of invasion, size of largest focus

 

Treatment and prognosis

=========================================================================

● Cure rate is close to 100% with surgical excision (Ann Oncol 2004;15:1633)

● Prognosis may depend on features of DCIS (AJSP 2000;24:422)

 

Microscopic description

=========================================================================

● Usually ductal, rarely tubular or lobular morphology

● Nodules of invading neoplastic cells in periductal or perilobular stroma, none exceeding 1.0 mm

● Usually arises in background of high grade DCIS; stromal microinvasion typically associated with fibroblast proliferation, collagenization and focal inflammation

False positives: lobular cancerization, radial scar, sclerosing adenosis (Archives 2001;125:1259)

False negatives: masking of invasion by inflammatory cells or histiocytes; use cytokeratin to highlight tumor cells

 

Micro images

=========================================================================

 

               

With high grade DCIS

 

 

                                                                               

Microinvasion (arrow) and               High grade DCIS with                         Low grade cribriform DCIS

chronic inflammation                        focus of microinvasion < 1 mm      with focal microinvasion just beyond

                                                                                                                                TDLU (arrows)

 

 

Examples from core biopsies

 

 

    

Figure A                                       Fig A: DCIS with foci equivocal for microinvasion,

                                                      Fig B: DCIS with early microinvasion,     

                                                      Fig C: DCIS with late microinvasion, Fig D: small invasive ductal

                                                      carcinoma (T1a), the breast lobule shows both DCIS (left) and

                                                      invasive carcinoma (right)

 

 

    

Tumor breaches basement membrane

 

 

Fig A: false negative due to inflammatory cells, Fig B: false negative due to mistaking tumor cells for histiocytes, Fig C: AE1-3 distinguishes tumor cells (+) from inflammatory cells (-), Fig D: smooth muscle actin highlights myoepithelial cells in benign but not malignant lesions

 

Negative stains

=========================================================================

● Myoepithelial layer is not intact in invasive component (detected with smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, smooth muscle actin, calponin, p63)

 

Additional references

=========================================================================

Hum Path 1998;29:1412

 

End of Breast – Malignant, Males, Children > Microinvasive carcinoma

 

 

 

This information is intended for physicians and related personnel, who understand that medical information is often imperfect, and must also be interpreted in the context of a patient's clinical data using reasonable medical judgment.  This website should not be used as a substitute for the advice of a licensed physician.

 

All information on this website is protected by Copyright, (c) 2001-2009, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.  Information from third parties may also be protected by copyright.  Please contact us at copyrightPathOut@gmail.com with any questions.